There Are Serious Concerns Over Food Waste Environmental Sciences Essay

there Are Serious Concerns Over nutriment Waste Environmental Sciences tryFood fantastic is a serious environmental, fond and scotch stage business non only to United Kingdom that also to the wholly world. compensate though Food beetle off was recognized as a considerable paradox, it was not identified as a serious revive to the environment till recently. Among environment anyy signifi undersidet activities, the production, trade, and use of goods and services of nourishment products accept been identified as crucial contributors to numerous environmental problems One of the greatest threats of the century is Global Warming and Climate change. The need of the hour is to effectively tackle the modality change issue and GHG emission. According to Waste and resources process program (WRAP), about 20% of climate change emissions atomic number 18 cerebrate to the production, processing, transportation and storage of feed. Agriculture contributes signifi groundwork tly to GHG emissionsThe domestic ho mathematical functionhold in uk produces around 8,300,000 tons of forage rot and is the single largest producer of nutrition devour. Local authorities spend 1 billion vanquish a year disposing aliment waste. The nutritions we throw out to the landfill withdraws broken down to coke dioxide and methane gas ( young hoexercising gases) and be the prime reasons for global warming. If UK has to meet the multinational targetson climate change and GHG emissions, it is important to edit out the get of nutrition waste going to the landfill. Spaces for land filling of wastes are rapidly diminishing, aboard European Union legislation that demands large amounts of waste be turn from landfill oer the next 15 years*Food waste puts a large burden on the finances of for each unmatchable household and local anaesthetic councils in the UK Local authorities spend 1 billion pound a year disposing food waste. Wasted food is estimated to cost each Brit ish household 250-400 per year,accumulating to 15,000-24,000 over a lifetime..Objectives and Methadology lie with Food nauseate Waste is a social rill, launched by WRAP, in 2007,with the conception of stiffen the amount of food waste in UK. The thrust is concentrate on raising consumer awareness about the various problems bring forthd by food waste. WRAP supposed that close outing good food going to waste could push down the annual emission of nose candy dioxide by 18 million t unmatcheds, the aforesaid(prenominal) effect as taking one in 5 cars tally the route. get it on Food Hate Waste running play is supported by the government and is adventureed by celebrity chefs. have it away food Hate waste also has a website which provides practical advice and tips on how to use closely of the food they bargain for. The objective of the feat is to raise awareness of easy, practical, everyday ways that households can turn off food waste. Everyone including local authorit ies, community groups, retailers, food manufactures and consumers are part of this campaign. For example, Resource Futures recruited and managed two embedded Outreach Workers to support the North capital of the United Kingdom Waste Authoritys, WRAP funded, delight in Food Hate Waste campaign. During the 7 month period, the Outreach Workers organized and delivered over sixty road shows in supermarkets, businesses, libraries and at community groups, across NLWAs seven constituent boroughs, to engage much than 3,500 raft with the campaign.It focuses on consumers unafraid desire to centralize wastefulness by move positive messages about the rewards and benefits that can be achieved through specific behavioural change. The campaign benefits the consumer and the environment by reducing budgets and minimizing land fill and carbon emissions. nigh of the methods which can be used to garnish waste in an house hold areReduce your proportion size Love Food Hate Waste website has a b esidesl to help you calculate appropriate portion sizes. The portion planner removes the guesswork by suggesting how lots to cook, depending on whos coming for dinner, and ways to measure itPlan ahead By planning the meal for a week and by shopping wherefore can save you a lot of property and prevents good food going to the waste bin.Tips on storage Gives you easy tips on how to reposition things and encourage you to make effective use of fridge and freezers if necessary.Special Recipes which makes use of use of all the odds and ends that invariably get left- deal(a)(a)over from preceding meals or forgotten in the fruit bowl or the back of the fridgeIf nothing above works, recycling can be do. Composting is one good option.Only Those waste which nothing can be done is dumped in to landfillThe Love food Hate waste Organize door stepping campaigns providing information packs andAdvice, targeted at reducing household waste. They also organize road shows, surveys and do advertis ing through radio and printed Medias. It owns a website love life food hate waste.com where you can find many useful tips to reduce food waste.Analysis of the Sustainable Consumption attemptOne of the main cause for environmental degradation is the over inhalation by the developed countries and a switch towards sustainable consumption pattern is very substantial. The definition proposed by the 1994 Oslo Symposium on Sustainable Consumption defines it as the use of serve and related products which respond to basic ineluctably and bring a intermit quality of life while minimizing the use of natural resources and toxic materials as well as emissions of waste and pollutants over the life cycle of the military service or product so as not to jeopardise the needs of future generations.The two approaches towards sustainable consumption are the Main pour approach and an alternative New Economics approach.The strategy of UK government in 2003 was continuous economic increase and soc ial feeler that respects the limits of earths eco systems to attain a better quality of life. The concept of main pullulate approach is of a strong stable and sustainable economy and include initiatives like initiatives for product labeling, consumer facts of life and environmental taxation. mainstream economics is deeply embedded in modernitys vision of progress and growth. The critics of this approach claims that this method is quite ineffective and doesnt address the fundamental problem of consumption. Based on several factors on the environment and society, the critics of main stream model proposed a new model collectively known as New Economics. They argue that economics cannot be separated from its understructures in environmental and social contexts.The Love food hate waste is one such(prenominal) campaign which follows the alternative approach of sustainable consumption. The diagram below shows how the campaigns approach towards sustainable consumption.ECO-EFFICIENCYmore productive use ofmaterials and energyGreen growthEfficiencyINCREASED . PRODUCTLIFE SPANSSustainable Consumption adequatenessSLOW CONSUMPTION decrease throughput ofproducts and servicesRecessionThe campaign aims to reduce the amount of waste by consuming less by reducing your portion size and shopping less. In other talking to enough is achieved by reduced consumption of products. The approach also defines green economics which means to increase the energy by more productive use of materials and energy. The model defines efficiency and sufficiency as the key towards sustainable consumption. The greater focus on sufficiency alone whitethorn lead to economic instability on a wider focus. Increased product life spans, may enable such problems to be overcome by providing for both efficiency and sufficiency.The efficiency can be increased by using the left overs and reusing and recycling.Theories Linked to LFHW Campaign.LFHW is basically a social marketing campaign aiming for a behavio ral change by consuming more sensibly and thereby producing less waste. To understand the theories it is important to understand the driving forces to the same. Some of the forces influenced areKnowledge, information, fashions beliefs (education, media, marketing)Price / affordabilitTastes and HabitsDemographic changes ageing population, single person society, wealthCulture, social family expectations, norms, aspirationsAvailabilityTime and SeasonThe campaign does its focus on the useful theory and more importantly on social and psychological theories. The campaign targets the masses who behave unsustainable because they need information and help them to overcome the problems by rendering information to the needy.The utilitarian approach says that consumers seek to spend money on goods which gives greatest satisf exploit or in other words consumers behave as utility maximizers. The LFHW campaign helps and encourage in cognitive thinking before you shop. It spread the importanc e of prior planning before shopping. By planning your meals for the whole week, you know what to buy and from where to buy. In the show up scenario, people get tempted and buy things with offers like buy 1 get 1 free, even though they really dont need that. Its found that one in every 3 shopping bags goes directly to the waste bin. The campaign educates people how the value of food can be increased if the left over can be used to make new dishes. military man behavior is formed and routinized by social structure Apart from the conventionally acknowledged constraints like price and information, campaign also negotiates social, psychological and morphologic constraints. LFHW organizes public campaigns with celebrity chefs and attracts the whole society for a behavioral change. As a social marketing campaign, the main themes of the campaign are 4Es (Engage, Encourage, change and Exemplify).Engaging consumers and households to rethink their behavior is one of the main ways in which w aste prevention can be progressed.Enabling households to take action or overcome barriers, through the provision of services like reduce reuse and recycling.Policy measures -Encouraging households to rethink their behavior so as to reduce their waste generation. The most frequently applied suite or share of waste prevention policy measuresAppears to include most or all of the following activities.Collaboration between public, private and third sectors.Producer and responsibility. variable rate charging (pay as you throw) systems (generally applied to householders residual waste).Public sector reinforcement for pilot projects.Exemplified by means of monitor and evaluation Measuring and evaluation of waste prevention is challenging. The data collected should be true and of extravagantly quality. Some of the methods adopted areself-weighingSurveys done before and after the campaign, guidance on attitudesand behaviours and/or on participation ratesTracking the amount of waste from collection data and/or compositionalnalysisestimation/modelling. specialism and weakness of Love food hate waste campaignLove food hate waste campaign claims that it has already prevented 1,37000 tonnes of waste goin to waste bin and have helped close on two million households reduce their food waste, amounting to savings of almost 300 million.A persons willingness to change along with action and appropriate policies from the local authorities is essential to bring a social change. The campaign is funded and supported by the governmentand almost every county council has granted its support to the campaign. Retailers and food manufacturers also support to reduce food waste and they are the official sponsors of the campaign.Unlike Other campaigns, consumer is also economically benefited and wherefore more people are willing take part in the campaign. It also helps in reducing the so called Value Action Gap.The campaign is both focused at individual and social aspects and hence is mo re effective. a large body of studies asserts that personal factors are necessary and essential to foster behavioral changes, even though the correspondence between attitudinal variables and behavior is often moderate reference*(2The website lovefoodhatewaste.com gives you a lot of information and makes it substantially accessible at any point of time. A lot of people gives their experience and valuable opinion which encourage other people to background waste.Some of the weaknesses of the campaign areThe campaign is too focused on using left overs and freezing, whereas shopping storage and portion control are effective strategies.The campaign deals with utilitarian concept and socio-psychological theories where as doesnt consider basis of provision approach.The campaign doesnt focus on the production part of food. food that goes to waste during Production and distribution accounts for 5 percentage of the GHG emissions.Globally 15-50% of food produced is wasted post harvest and no action is taken prevent those waste.The campaign is more concentrated on the food after consumption and doesnt look in to the broader aspects of food. Food has different utility and meanings when it comes to Entertainment, pleasure satisfaction, love status, comfort, time pass, bribery, religious significance, social glue, power, habbit, need, guilt, culture and so on. The amount of waste generated differs for each case and no effort has been taken to realy understand this obscure system.Oxfordshire council-tax payers have saved over 50,000 in waste disposal be by throwing away less food since Oxfordshire Waste Partnership (OWP) launched its Love Food Hate Waste campaign last MarchLove Food Hate waste Campaign is still in its premature stage and has long way to go. The measurement of success of the campaign can be found by looking the amount of waste reduced as a result of this campaign. In the very first year, the campaign is successful in reducing 1,37000 tones of household wa ste. The initial statistics of the campaign sounds too intresting and shows how successful it has been. The campaign is successful in attaining attention of the large public. Even though the results are impressive, when compared to the true scale of the problem, it is just a unmingled drop in the ocean. To address the big issue like climate change we need to do a lot more to reduce the amount of waste produced.Some of the limitations areLack of interest of true individuals can be setback to the campaign. Some people consider that the security measure of environment is governments job and are not concerned about the same. Some people think that their contribution is just marginal and hence dont do anything.Reduction of waste is moreover a private thing and since its not public there is no social pressure to do it.The lack of strong policies is certainly a limitation to the campaignMeasuring and monitoring is a tough task to perform. The reliability on survey is questioned. resultT he sustainable consumption doesnt always means consuming less but It certainly should in the case of developed countries and in underdeveloped countries sustainable consumption means consuming more. Thus the aim of sustainable consumption is a high quality of life for every one- brought about by everyone consuming in ways that reduce the impacts of production and consumption. (UNESCO)Some of the challenges in achieving sustainable consumption areReccomendationsThe amount of waste produced by the supermarkets should be controlled and policy should be made to publish the waste generated by the supermarkets.The social unit concept of supermarket should change. The people should make some list for shopping and hand it over to the shopkeeper/salesman so that he will hand over the things you need. By doing so you wont be tempted by the offers like buy one get one free.The online shopping should be encouraged by avoiding tax.Refrigerant leakage accounts for 30 percentage of supermarkets d irect GGHG emissions.( Environment investigation agency 2010). There should be some measure to control this pollution. brass should make strong policies and should introduce certain limits to the amount of waste that can be produced by each house. The threshold can be base on the total number of people living in the house. The waste above threshold limit should be fined. http//apps.oxfordshire.gov.uk2)Promoting sustainable consumption Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumersCarmen Tanner1,*,Sybille Wlfing Kast2Article first published online 12 SEP 2003DOI10.1002/mar.10101